Czechoslovakia vs Hungary: Mineral fertilizers — Cropland potassium
Mineral fertilizers — Cropland potassium over time
- Czechoslovakia
- Hungary
How they compare
Czechoslovakia currently reports 35,100 t against 34,862 t in Hungary, a difference of 238 t.
Across all 32 years both countries report, Czechoslovakia has been ahead every year.
Czechoslovakia ranks 52nd and Hungary ranks 53rd of 185 countries.
Czechoslovakia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Czechoslovakia | Hungary | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 357,573 t | 74,110 t | 283,464 t | Czechoslovakia |
| 1970s | 606,813 t | 357,734 t | 249,079 t | Czechoslovakia |
| 1980s | 536,643 t | 379,669 t | 156,974 t | Czechoslovakia |
| 1990s | 150,867 t | 69,645 t | 81,221 t | Czechoslovakia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher mineral fertilizers — cropland potassium, Czechoslovakia or Hungary?
- Czechoslovakia, at 35,100 t against 34,862 t in Hungary as of 1992.
- What is the difference in mineral fertilizers — cropland potassium between Czechoslovakia and Hungary?
- 238 t, with Czechoslovakia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Czechoslovakia and Hungary?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1992.
- How do Czechoslovakia and Hungary rank globally for mineral fertilizers — cropland potassium?
- Czechoslovakia ranks 52nd and Hungary ranks 53rd of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Mineral fertilizers — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).