Djibouti vs South Sudan: Mineral fertilizers — Cropland potassium
Mineral fertilizers — Cropland potassium over time
- Djibouti
- South Sudan
How they compare
Djibouti currently reports 5.81 t against 3.32 t in South Sudan, a difference of 2.49 t.
That makes Djibouti's figure about 1.8 times South Sudan's.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 12 shared years of data; in 2012 it was Djibouti ahead.
Djibouti ranks 172nd and South Sudan ranks 173rd of 186 countries.
South Sudan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Djibouti | South Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 3.84 t | 15.56 t | 11.72 t | South Sudan |
| 2020s | 6.02 t | 8.09 t | 2.07 t | South Sudan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher mineral fertilizers — cropland potassium, Djibouti or South Sudan?
- Djibouti, at 5.81 t against 3.32 t in South Sudan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in mineral fertilizers — cropland potassium between Djibouti and South Sudan?
- 2.49 t, with Djibouti ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Djibouti and South Sudan?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2023.
- How do Djibouti and South Sudan rank globally for mineral fertilizers — cropland potassium?
- Djibouti ranks 172nd and South Sudan ranks 173rd of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Mineral fertilizers — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).