Egypt vs Uruguay: Mineral fertilizers — Cropland potassium
Mineral fertilizers — Cropland potassium over time
- Egypt
- Uruguay
How they compare
Egypt currently reports 115,038 t against 103,535 t in Uruguay, a difference of 11,503 t.
That makes Egypt's figure about 1.1 times Uruguay's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Uruguay ahead.
Egypt ranks 28th and Uruguay ranks 31st of 186 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Egypt averaged higher in 5 and Uruguay in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Egypt | Uruguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 913.37 t | 3,083 t | 2,170 t | Uruguay |
| 1970s | 2,704 t | 3,723 t | 1,019 t | Uruguay |
| 1980s | 16,941 t | 2,190 t | 14,750 t | Egypt |
| 1990s | 25,135 t | 3,744 t | 21,392 t | Egypt |
| 2000s | 40,114 t | 3,038 t | 37,076 t | Egypt |
| 2010s | 58,901 t | 54,690 t | 4,211 t | Egypt |
| 2020s | 109,830 t | 94,485 t | 15,345 t | Egypt |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher mineral fertilizers — cropland potassium, Egypt or Uruguay?
- Egypt, at 115,038 t against 103,535 t in Uruguay as of 2023.
- What is the difference in mineral fertilizers — cropland potassium between Egypt and Uruguay?
- 11,503 t, with Egypt ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Egypt and Uruguay?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Egypt and Uruguay rank globally for mineral fertilizers — cropland potassium?
- Egypt ranks 28th and Uruguay ranks 31st of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Mineral fertilizers — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).