Eritrea vs Solomon Islands: Mineral fertilizers — Cropland potassium
Mineral fertilizers — Cropland potassium over time
- Eritrea
- Solomon Islands
How they compare
Eritrea currently reports 0.83 t against 0 t in Solomon Islands, a difference of 0.83 t.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Solomon Islands ahead.
Eritrea ranks 175th and Solomon Islands ranks 177th of 186 countries.
Solomon Islands has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eritrea | Solomon Islands | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 1.66 t | 2.49 t | 0.83 t | Solomon Islands |
| 2000s | 2.41 t | 23.24 t | 20.83 t | Solomon Islands |
| 2010s | 2.24 t | 503.48 t | 501.24 t | Solomon Islands |
| 2020s | 0.6225 t | 358.56 t | 357.94 t | Solomon Islands |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher mineral fertilizers — cropland potassium, Eritrea or Solomon Islands?
- Eritrea, at 0.83 t against 0 t in Solomon Islands as of 2023.
- What is the difference in mineral fertilizers — cropland potassium between Eritrea and Solomon Islands?
- 0.83 t, with Eritrea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eritrea and Solomon Islands?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
- How do Eritrea and Solomon Islands rank globally for mineral fertilizers — cropland potassium?
- Eritrea ranks 175th and Solomon Islands ranks 177th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Mineral fertilizers — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).