Ethiopia PDR vs Malta: Mineral fertilizers — Cropland potassium
Mineral fertilizers — Cropland potassium over time
- Ethiopia PDR
- Malta
How they compare
Malta currently reports 126.16 t against 100 t in Ethiopia PDR, a difference of 26.16 t.
That makes Malta's figure about 1.3 times Ethiopia PDR's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 6 shared years of data; in 1975 it was Ethiopia PDR ahead.
Ethiopia PDR ranks 157th and Malta ranks 156th of 186 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Ethiopia PDR averaged higher in 1 and Malta in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ethiopia PDR | Malta | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 166.67 t | 48.97 t | 117.7 t | Ethiopia PDR |
| 1980s | 133.33 t | 167.38 t | 34.05 t | Malta |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher mineral fertilizers — cropland potassium, Ethiopia PDR or Malta?
- Malta, at 126.16 t against 100 t in Ethiopia PDR as of 2023.
- What is the difference in mineral fertilizers — cropland potassium between Ethiopia PDR and Malta?
- 26.16 t, with Malta ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ethiopia PDR and Malta?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 1975 to 1983.
- How do Ethiopia PDR and Malta rank globally for mineral fertilizers — cropland potassium?
- Ethiopia PDR ranks 157th and Malta ranks 156th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Mineral fertilizers — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).