Ethiopia PDR vs Saint Lucia: Mineral fertilizers — Cropland potassium
Mineral fertilizers — Cropland potassium over time
- Ethiopia PDR
- Saint Lucia
How they compare
Ethiopia PDR currently reports 100 t against 88.81 t in Saint Lucia, a difference of 11.19 t.
That makes Ethiopia PDR's figure about 1.1 times Saint Lucia's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 1975 it was Saint Lucia ahead.
Ethiopia PDR ranks 157th and Saint Lucia ranks 158th of 186 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Ethiopia PDR averaged higher in 1 and Saint Lucia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ethiopia PDR | Saint Lucia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 166.67 t | 460.93 t | 294.26 t | Saint Lucia |
| 1980s | 133.33 t | 67.78 t | 65.55 t | Ethiopia PDR |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher mineral fertilizers — cropland potassium, Ethiopia PDR or Saint Lucia?
- Ethiopia PDR, at 100 t against 88.81 t in Saint Lucia as of 1983.
- What is the difference in mineral fertilizers — cropland potassium between Ethiopia PDR and Saint Lucia?
- 11.19 t, with Ethiopia PDR ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ethiopia PDR and Saint Lucia?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 1975 to 1983.
- How do Ethiopia PDR and Saint Lucia rank globally for mineral fertilizers — cropland potassium?
- Ethiopia PDR ranks 157th and Saint Lucia ranks 158th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Mineral fertilizers — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).