Ethiopia vs Puerto Rico: Mineral fertilizers — Cropland potassium
Mineral fertilizers — Cropland potassium over time
- Ethiopia
- Puerto Rico
How they compare
Puerto Rico currently reports 1,625 t against 1,599 t in Ethiopia, a difference of 26 t.
The two have swapped places 10 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Puerto Rico ahead.
Ethiopia ranks 131st and Puerto Rico ranks 130th of 186 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Ethiopia averaged higher in 1 and Puerto Rico in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ethiopia | Puerto Rico | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 267.32 t | 981.06 t | 713.74 t | Puerto Rico |
| 2000s | 2,615 t | 597.43 t | 2,017 t | Ethiopia |
| 2010s | 1,413 t | 1,741 t | 328.45 t | Puerto Rico |
| 2020s | 1,367 t | 1,880 t | 513.15 t | Puerto Rico |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher mineral fertilizers — cropland potassium, Ethiopia or Puerto Rico?
- Puerto Rico, at 1,625 t against 1,599 t in Ethiopia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in mineral fertilizers — cropland potassium between Ethiopia and Puerto Rico?
- 26 t, with Puerto Rico ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ethiopia and Puerto Rico?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
- How do Ethiopia and Puerto Rico rank globally for mineral fertilizers — cropland potassium?
- Ethiopia ranks 131st and Puerto Rico ranks 130th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Mineral fertilizers — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).