Georgia vs Lebanon: Mineral fertilizers — Cropland potassium
Mineral fertilizers — Cropland potassium over time
- Georgia
- Lebanon
How they compare
Lebanon currently reports 3,448 t against 2,978 t in Georgia, a difference of 470 t.
That makes Lebanon's figure about 1.2 times Georgia's.
Across all 32 years both countries report, Lebanon has been ahead every year.
Georgia ranks 111th and Lebanon ranks 108th of 186 countries.
Lebanon has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Georgia | Lebanon | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 1,660 t | 4,814 t | 3,154 t | Lebanon |
| 2000s | 661.26 t | 6,741 t | 6,080 t | Lebanon |
| 2010s | 1,668 t | 6,804 t | 5,136 t | Lebanon |
| 2020s | 3,037 t | 3,676 t | 639.31 t | Lebanon |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher mineral fertilizers — cropland potassium, Georgia or Lebanon?
- Lebanon, at 3,448 t against 2,978 t in Georgia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in mineral fertilizers — cropland potassium between Georgia and Lebanon?
- 470 t, with Lebanon ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Georgia and Lebanon?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Georgia and Lebanon rank globally for mineral fertilizers — cropland potassium?
- Georgia ranks 111th and Lebanon ranks 108th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Mineral fertilizers — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).