Greece vs Serbia: Mineral fertilizers — Cropland potassium
Mineral fertilizers — Cropland potassium over time
- Greece
- Serbia
How they compare
Serbia currently reports 32,366 t against 31,993 t in Greece, a difference of 373 t.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 18 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Greece ahead.
Greece ranks 59th and Serbia ranks 58th of 186 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Greece averaged higher in 2 and Serbia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Greece | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 37,972 t | 35,906 t | 2,066 t | Greece |
| 2010s | 38,756 t | 37,806 t | 949.73 t | Greece |
| 2020s | 37,508 t | 38,516 t | 1,008 t | Serbia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher mineral fertilizers — cropland potassium, Greece or Serbia?
- Serbia, at 32,366 t against 31,993 t in Greece as of 2023.
- What is the difference in mineral fertilizers — cropland potassium between Greece and Serbia?
- 373 t, with Serbia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Greece and Serbia?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2023.
- How do Greece and Serbia rank globally for mineral fertilizers — cropland potassium?
- Greece ranks 59th and Serbia ranks 58th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Mineral fertilizers — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).