Guinea vs Suriname: Mineral fertilizers — Cropland potassium
Mineral fertilizers — Cropland potassium over time
- Guinea
- Suriname
How they compare
Suriname currently reports 327.44 t against 214.14 t in Guinea, a difference of 113.3 t.
That makes Suriname's figure about 1.5 times Guinea's.
The two have swapped places 17 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Guinea ahead.
Guinea ranks 150th and Suriname ranks 148th of 186 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Guinea averaged higher in 5 and Suriname in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guinea | Suriname | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 1,115 t | 63.36 t | 1,052 t | Guinea |
| 1970s | 442.22 t | 150.89 t | 291.33 t | Guinea |
| 1980s | 153.05 t | 709.32 t | 556.27 t | Suriname |
| 1990s | 464.55 t | 265.6 t | 198.95 t | Guinea |
| 2000s | 340.72 t | 905.86 t | 565.15 t | Suriname |
| 2010s | 2,229 t | 972.34 t | 1,256 t | Guinea |
| 2020s | 3,764 t | 442.6 t | 3,321 t | Guinea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher mineral fertilizers — cropland potassium, Guinea or Suriname?
- Suriname, at 327.44 t against 214.14 t in Guinea as of 2023.
- What is the difference in mineral fertilizers — cropland potassium between Guinea and Suriname?
- 113.3 t, with Suriname ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guinea and Suriname?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Guinea and Suriname rank globally for mineral fertilizers — cropland potassium?
- Guinea ranks 150th and Suriname ranks 148th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Mineral fertilizers — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).