Guyana vs Iceland: Mineral fertilizers — Cropland potassium
Mineral fertilizers — Cropland potassium over time
- Guyana
- Iceland
How they compare
Iceland currently reports 2,096 t against 2,084 t in Guyana, a difference of 12 t.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Iceland ahead.
Guyana ranks 122nd and Iceland ranks 120th of 185 countries.
Iceland has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guyana | Iceland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 1,627 t | 2,962 t | 1,335 t | Iceland |
| 1970s | 1,353 t | 4,767 t | 3,414 t | Iceland |
| 1980s | 962.47 t | 4,761 t | 3,798 t | Iceland |
| 1990s | 946.2 t | 3,235 t | 2,289 t | Iceland |
| 2000s | 600.17 t | 2,503 t | 1,903 t | Iceland |
| 2010s | 1,399 t | 3,433 t | 2,034 t | Iceland |
| 2020s | 1,946 t | 2,944 t | 998.28 t | Iceland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher mineral fertilizers — cropland potassium, Guyana or Iceland?
- Iceland, at 2,096 t against 2,084 t in Guyana as of 2023.
- What is the difference in mineral fertilizers — cropland potassium between Guyana and Iceland?
- 12 t, with Iceland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guyana and Iceland?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Guyana and Iceland rank globally for mineral fertilizers — cropland potassium?
- Guyana ranks 122nd and Iceland ranks 120th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Mineral fertilizers — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).