Guyana vs Sudan: Mineral fertilizers — Cropland potassium
Mineral fertilizers — Cropland potassium over time
- Guyana
- Sudan
How they compare
Sudan currently reports 2,321 t against 2,084 t in Guyana, a difference of 237 t.
That makes Sudan's figure about 1.1 times Guyana's.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 12 shared years of data; in 2012 it was Sudan ahead.
Guyana ranks 122nd and Sudan ranks 119th of 186 countries.
Sudan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guyana | Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 1,685 t | 3,432 t | 1,747 t | Sudan |
| 2020s | 1,946 t | 2,103 t | 157.69 t | Sudan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher mineral fertilizers — cropland potassium, Guyana or Sudan?
- Sudan, at 2,321 t against 2,084 t in Guyana as of 2023.
- What is the difference in mineral fertilizers — cropland potassium between Guyana and Sudan?
- 237 t, with Sudan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guyana and Sudan?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2023.
- How do Guyana and Sudan rank globally for mineral fertilizers — cropland potassium?
- Guyana ranks 122nd and Sudan ranks 119th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Mineral fertilizers — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).