Honduras vs Kenya: Mineral fertilizers — Cropland potassium
Mineral fertilizers — Cropland potassium over time
- Honduras
- Kenya
How they compare
Kenya currently reports 49,474 t against 45,567 t in Honduras, a difference of 3,907 t.
That makes Kenya's figure about 1.1 times Honduras's.
The two have swapped places 20 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Kenya ahead.
Honduras ranks 43rd and Kenya ranks 42nd of 185 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Honduras averaged higher in 6 and Kenya in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Honduras | Kenya | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 1,828 t | 1,342 t | 485.78 t | Honduras |
| 1970s | 5,802 t | 3,923 t | 1,879 t | Honduras |
| 1980s | 6,788 t | 6,798 t | 9.79 t | Kenya |
| 1990s | 11,340 t | 8,350 t | 2,990 t | Honduras |
| 2000s | 9,158 t | 5,705 t | 3,454 t | Honduras |
| 2010s | 34,529 t | 19,293 t | 15,236 t | Honduras |
| 2020s | 47,184 t | 28,538 t | 18,646 t | Honduras |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher mineral fertilizers — cropland potassium, Honduras or Kenya?
- Kenya, at 49,474 t against 45,567 t in Honduras as of 2023.
- What is the difference in mineral fertilizers — cropland potassium between Honduras and Kenya?
- 3,907 t, with Kenya ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Honduras and Kenya?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Honduras and Kenya rank globally for mineral fertilizers — cropland potassium?
- Honduras ranks 43rd and Kenya ranks 42nd of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Mineral fertilizers — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).