Hungary vs Sri Lanka: Mineral fertilizers — Cropland potassium
Mineral fertilizers — Cropland potassium over time
- Hungary
- Sri Lanka
How they compare
Sri Lanka currently reports 35,109 t against 34,862 t in Hungary, a difference of 247 t.
The two have swapped places 15 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Hungary ahead.
Hungary ranks 53rd and Sri Lanka ranks 51st of 186 countries.
Hungary has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Hungary | Sri Lanka | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 74,110 t | 26,501 t | 47,608 t | Hungary |
| 1970s | 357,734 t | 24,926 t | 332,808 t | Hungary |
| 1980s | 379,669 t | 43,899 t | 335,770 t | Hungary |
| 1990s | 53,612 t | 46,652 t | 6,960 t | Hungary |
| 2000s | 55,298 t | 53,069 t | 2,229 t | Hungary |
| 2010s | 63,290 t | 56,361 t | 6,928 t | Hungary |
| 2020s | 61,672 t | 60,323 t | 1,350 t | Hungary |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher mineral fertilizers — cropland potassium, Hungary or Sri Lanka?
- Sri Lanka, at 35,109 t against 34,862 t in Hungary as of 2023.
- What is the difference in mineral fertilizers — cropland potassium between Hungary and Sri Lanka?
- 247 t, with Sri Lanka ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Hungary and Sri Lanka?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Hungary and Sri Lanka rank globally for mineral fertilizers — cropland potassium?
- Hungary ranks 53rd and Sri Lanka ranks 51st of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Mineral fertilizers — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).