Kuwait vs Rwanda: Mineral fertilizers — Cropland potassium
Mineral fertilizers — Cropland potassium over time
- Kuwait
- Rwanda
How they compare
Kuwait currently reports 6,410 t against 5,876 t in Rwanda, a difference of 534 t.
That makes Kuwait's figure about 1.1 times Rwanda's.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Kuwait ahead.
Kuwait ranks 106th and Rwanda ranks 109th of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Kuwait averaged higher in 4 and Rwanda in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kuwait | Rwanda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 166 t | 88.81 t | 77.19 t | Kuwait |
| 1970s | 166 t | 105.74 t | 60.26 t | Kuwait |
| 1980s | 68.77 t | 139.69 t | 70.92 t | Rwanda |
| 1990s | 29.64 t | 166.46 t | 136.81 t | Rwanda |
| 2000s | 511.76 t | 948.27 t | 436.51 t | Rwanda |
| 2010s | 4,270 t | 1,866 t | 2,404 t | Kuwait |
| 2020s | 5,721 t | 5,276 t | 445.09 t | Kuwait |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher mineral fertilizers — cropland potassium, Kuwait or Rwanda?
- Kuwait, at 6,410 t against 5,876 t in Rwanda as of 2023.
- What is the difference in mineral fertilizers — cropland potassium between Kuwait and Rwanda?
- 534 t, with Kuwait ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kuwait and Rwanda?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Kuwait and Rwanda rank globally for mineral fertilizers — cropland potassium?
- Kuwait ranks 106th and Rwanda ranks 109th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Mineral fertilizers — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).