Kyrgyzstan vs Sierra Leone: Mineral fertilizers — Cropland potassium
Mineral fertilizers — Cropland potassium over time
- Kyrgyzstan
- Sierra Leone
How they compare
Kyrgyzstan currently reports 859.47 t against 724.59 t in Sierra Leone, a difference of 134.88 t.
That makes Kyrgyzstan's figure about 1.2 times Sierra Leone's.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Kyrgyzstan ahead.
Kyrgyzstan ranks 140th and Sierra Leone ranks 142nd of 186 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Kyrgyzstan averaged higher in 3 and Sierra Leone in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kyrgyzstan | Sierra Leone | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 3,151 t | 573.74 t | 2,577 t | Kyrgyzstan |
| 2000s | 243.36 t | 80.59 t | 162.76 t | Kyrgyzstan |
| 2010s | 396.03 t | 679.44 t | 283.4 t | Sierra Leone |
| 2020s | 1,564 t | 724.59 t | 839.34 t | Kyrgyzstan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher mineral fertilizers — cropland potassium, Kyrgyzstan or Sierra Leone?
- Kyrgyzstan, at 859.47 t against 724.59 t in Sierra Leone as of 2023.
- What is the difference in mineral fertilizers — cropland potassium between Kyrgyzstan and Sierra Leone?
- 134.88 t, with Kyrgyzstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kyrgyzstan and Sierra Leone?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Kyrgyzstan and Sierra Leone rank globally for mineral fertilizers — cropland potassium?
- Kyrgyzstan ranks 140th and Sierra Leone ranks 142nd of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Mineral fertilizers — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).