Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) vs Spain: Mineral fertilizers — Cropland potassium

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
965,728 t
in 2023
Spain
248,934 t
in 2023
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) rank
13th
Spain rank
15th

Mineral fertilizers — Cropland potassium over time

  • Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
  • Spain
0200.0k400.0k600.0k800.0k1.0M196119922023

How they compare

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) currently reports 965,728 t against 248,934 t in Spain, a difference of 716,794 t.

That makes Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)'s figure about 3.9 times Spain's.

The two have swapped places 11 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Spain ahead.

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ranks 13th and Spain ranks 15th of 29 groups.

Across the 7 decades both report, Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) averaged higher in 3 and Spain in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) Spain Difference Ahead
1960s 83,319 t 93,351 t 10,032 t Spain
1970s 215,136 t 221,627 t 6,492 t Spain
1980s 282,732 t 251,504 t 31,228 t Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
1990s 264,072 t 356,900 t 92,828 t Spain
2000s 328,024 t 341,454 t 13,430 t Spain
2010s 663,671 t 303,993 t 359,678 t Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
2020s 875,816 t 288,760 t 587,056 t Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher mineral fertilizers — cropland potassium, Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) or Spain?
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs), at 965,728 t against 248,934 t in Spain as of 2023.
What is the difference in mineral fertilizers — cropland potassium between Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) and Spain?
716,794 t, with Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) and Spain?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) and Spain rank globally for mineral fertilizers — cropland potassium?
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ranks 13th and Spain ranks 15th of 29 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Mineral fertilizers — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) vs Spain: Mineral fertilizers — Cropland potassium. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 11 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/mineral-fertilizers-cropland-potassium/low-income-food-deficit-countries-lifdcs/spain/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/mineral-fertilizers-cropland-potassium/low-income-food-deficit-countries-lifdcs/spain/">Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) vs Spain: Mineral fertilizers — Cropland potassium</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Mineral fertilizers — Cropland potassium
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
233 places, 13,440 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).