Luxembourg vs New Caledonia: Mineral fertilizers — Cropland potassium
Mineral fertilizers — Cropland potassium over time
- Luxembourg
- New Caledonia
How they compare
New Caledonia currently reports 438.24 t against 425.29 t in Luxembourg, a difference of 12.95 t.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Luxembourg ahead.
Luxembourg ranks 145th and New Caledonia ranks 144th of 186 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Luxembourg averaged higher in 2 and New Caledonia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Luxembourg | New Caledonia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 885.15 t | 377.15 t | 507.99 t | Luxembourg |
| 2010s | 501.64 t | 391.1 t | 110.54 t | Luxembourg |
| 2020s | 349.1 t | 438.24 t | 89.14 t | New Caledonia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher mineral fertilizers — cropland potassium, Luxembourg or New Caledonia?
- New Caledonia, at 438.24 t against 425.29 t in Luxembourg as of 2023.
- What is the difference in mineral fertilizers — cropland potassium between Luxembourg and New Caledonia?
- 12.95 t, with New Caledonia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Luxembourg and New Caledonia?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Luxembourg and New Caledonia rank globally for mineral fertilizers — cropland potassium?
- Luxembourg ranks 145th and New Caledonia ranks 144th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Mineral fertilizers — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).