Luxembourg vs Sierra Leone: Mineral fertilizers — Cropland potassium
Mineral fertilizers — Cropland potassium over time
- Luxembourg
- Sierra Leone
How they compare
Sierra Leone currently reports 724.59 t against 425.29 t in Luxembourg, a difference of 299.3 t.
That makes Sierra Leone's figure about 1.7 times Luxembourg's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Luxembourg ahead.
Luxembourg ranks 145th and Sierra Leone ranks 142nd of 186 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Luxembourg averaged higher in 1 and Sierra Leone in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Luxembourg | Sierra Leone | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 885.15 t | 80.59 t | 804.55 t | Luxembourg |
| 2010s | 501.64 t | 679.44 t | 177.8 t | Sierra Leone |
| 2020s | 349.1 t | 724.59 t | 375.49 t | Sierra Leone |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher mineral fertilizers — cropland potassium, Luxembourg or Sierra Leone?
- Sierra Leone, at 724.59 t against 425.29 t in Luxembourg as of 2023.
- What is the difference in mineral fertilizers — cropland potassium between Luxembourg and Sierra Leone?
- 299.3 t, with Sierra Leone ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Luxembourg and Sierra Leone?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Luxembourg and Sierra Leone rank globally for mineral fertilizers — cropland potassium?
- Luxembourg ranks 145th and Sierra Leone ranks 142nd of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Mineral fertilizers — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).