Mali vs New Zealand: Mineral fertilizers — Cropland potassium
Mineral fertilizers — Cropland potassium over time
- Mali
- New Zealand
How they compare
Mali currently reports 13,727 t against 11,264 t in New Zealand, a difference of 2,463 t.
That makes Mali's figure about 1.2 times New Zealand's.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was New Zealand ahead.
Mali ranks 80th and New Zealand ranks 82nd of 186 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Mali averaged higher in 3 and New Zealand in 4.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mali | New Zealand | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 68.89 t | 8,342 t | 8,274 t | New Zealand |
| 1970s | 1,025 t | 13,435 t | 12,409 t | New Zealand |
| 1980s | 3,110 t | 10,304 t | 7,194 t | New Zealand |
| 1990s | 5,777 t | 12,484 t | 6,707 t | New Zealand |
| 2000s | 16,657 t | 13,648 t | 3,009 t | Mali |
| 2010s | 20,308 t | 13,059 t | 7,249 t | Mali |
| 2020s | 20,856 t | 13,503 t | 7,353 t | Mali |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher mineral fertilizers — cropland potassium, Mali or New Zealand?
- Mali, at 13,727 t against 11,264 t in New Zealand as of 2023.
- What is the difference in mineral fertilizers — cropland potassium between Mali and New Zealand?
- 2,463 t, with Mali ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mali and New Zealand?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Mali and New Zealand rank globally for mineral fertilizers — cropland potassium?
- Mali ranks 80th and New Zealand ranks 82nd of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Mineral fertilizers — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).