Mexico vs Oceania: Mineral fertilizers — Cropland potassium
Mineral fertilizers — Cropland potassium over time
- Mexico
- Oceania
How they compare
Oceania currently reports 209,395 t against 154,589 t in Mexico, a difference of 54,806 t.
That makes Oceania's figure about 1.4 times Mexico's.
The two have swapped places 10 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Oceania ahead.
Mexico ranks 22nd and Oceania ranks 14th of 185 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Mexico averaged higher in 1 and Oceania in 6.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mexico | Oceania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 10,312 t | 50,736 t | 40,424 t | Oceania |
| 1970s | 33,183 t | 82,864 t | 49,682 t | Oceania |
| 1980s | 60,362 t | 109,676 t | 49,314 t | Oceania |
| 1990s | 83,802 t | 149,874 t | 66,072 t | Oceania |
| 2000s | 154,786 t | 164,280 t | 9,494 t | Oceania |
| 2010s | 199,780 t | 181,157 t | 18,623 t | Mexico |
| 2020s | 205,663 t | 234,297 t | 28,634 t | Oceania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher mineral fertilizers — cropland potassium, Mexico or Oceania?
- Oceania, at 209,395 t against 154,589 t in Mexico as of 2023.
- What is the difference in mineral fertilizers — cropland potassium between Mexico and Oceania?
- 54,806 t, with Oceania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mexico and Oceania?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Mexico and Oceania rank globally for mineral fertilizers — cropland potassium?
- Mexico ranks 22nd and Oceania ranks 14th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Mineral fertilizers — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).