Middle Africa vs Yugoslav SFR: Mineral fertilizers — Cropland potassium
Mineral fertilizers — Cropland potassium over time
- Middle Africa
- Yugoslav SFR
How they compare
Yugoslav SFR currently reports 154,300 t against 60,737 t in Middle Africa, a difference of 93,563 t.
That makes Yugoslav SFR's figure about 2.5 times Middle Africa's.
Across all 31 years both countries report, Yugoslav SFR has been ahead every year.
Middle Africa ranks 5th and Yugoslav SFR ranks 23rd of 18 regions.
Yugoslav SFR has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Middle Africa | Yugoslav SFR | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 5,996 t | 126,105 t | 120,109 t | Yugoslav SFR |
| 1970s | 14,526 t | 176,856 t | 162,330 t | Yugoslav SFR |
| 1980s | 15,403 t | 241,901 t | 226,497 t | Yugoslav SFR |
| 1990s | 14,261 t | 172,150 t | 157,889 t | Yugoslav SFR |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher mineral fertilizers — cropland potassium, Middle Africa or Yugoslav SFR?
- Yugoslav SFR, at 154,300 t against 60,737 t in Middle Africa as of 1991.
- What is the difference in mineral fertilizers — cropland potassium between Middle Africa and Yugoslav SFR?
- 93,563 t, with Yugoslav SFR ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Middle Africa and Yugoslav SFR?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1991.
- How do Middle Africa and Yugoslav SFR rank globally for mineral fertilizers — cropland potassium?
- Middle Africa ranks 5th and Yugoslav SFR ranks 23rd of 18 regions.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Mineral fertilizers — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).