Montenegro vs Suriname: Mineral fertilizers — Cropland potassium
Mineral fertilizers — Cropland potassium over time
- Montenegro
- Suriname
How they compare
Montenegro currently reports 400.89 t against 327.44 t in Suriname, a difference of 73.45 t.
That makes Montenegro's figure about 1.2 times Suriname's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 18 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Suriname ahead.
Montenegro ranks 146th and Suriname ranks 148th of 186 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Montenegro averaged higher in 1 and Suriname in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Montenegro | Suriname | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 489.49 t | 1,729 t | 1,240 t | Suriname |
| 2010s | 437.24 t | 972.34 t | 535.1 t | Suriname |
| 2020s | 465.22 t | 442.6 t | 22.62 t | Montenegro |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher mineral fertilizers — cropland potassium, Montenegro or Suriname?
- Montenegro, at 400.89 t against 327.44 t in Suriname as of 2023.
- What is the difference in mineral fertilizers — cropland potassium between Montenegro and Suriname?
- 73.45 t, with Montenegro ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Montenegro and Suriname?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2023.
- How do Montenegro and Suriname rank globally for mineral fertilizers — cropland potassium?
- Montenegro ranks 146th and Suriname ranks 148th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Mineral fertilizers — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).