Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) vs Russian Federation: Mineral fertilizers — Cropland potassium

Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs)
1.37 million t
in 2023
Russian Federation
491,222 t
in 2023
Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) rank
12th
Russian Federation rank
10th

Mineral fertilizers — Cropland potassium over time

  • Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs)
  • Russian Federation
0500.0k1.0M1.5M196119922023

How they compare

Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) currently reports 1.37 million t against 491,222 t in Russian Federation, a difference of 876,638 t.

That makes Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs)'s figure about 2.8 times Russian Federation's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Russian Federation ahead.

Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) ranks 12th and Russian Federation ranks 10th of 29 groups.

Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) Russian Federation Difference Ahead
1990s 492,894 t 357,907 t 134,987 t Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs)
2000s 588,434 t 180,078 t 408,356 t Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs)
2010s 1.08 million t 271,052 t 811,726 t Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs)
2020s 1.35 million t 472,914 t 881,908 t Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher mineral fertilizers — cropland potassium, Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) or Russian Federation?
Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs), at 1.37 million t against 491,222 t in Russian Federation as of 2023.
What is the difference in mineral fertilizers — cropland potassium between Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) and Russian Federation?
876,638 t, with Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) and Russian Federation?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) and Russian Federation rank globally for mineral fertilizers — cropland potassium?
Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) ranks 12th and Russian Federation ranks 10th of 29 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Mineral fertilizers — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) vs Russian Federation: Mineral fertilizers — Cropland potassium. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 26 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/mineral-fertilizers-cropland-potassium/net-food-importing-developing-countries-nfidcs/russian-federation-2/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/mineral-fertilizers-cropland-potassium/net-food-importing-developing-countries-nfidcs/russian-federation-2/">Net Food Importing Developing Countries (NFIDCs) vs Russian Federation: Mineral fertilizers — Cropland potassium</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Mineral fertilizers — Cropland potassium
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
233 places, 13,440 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).