Northern Africa vs Yugoslav SFR: Mineral fertilizers — Cropland potassium
Mineral fertilizers — Cropland potassium over time
- Northern Africa
- Yugoslav SFR
How they compare
Northern Africa currently reports 192,485 t against 154,300 t in Yugoslav SFR, a difference of 38,185 t.
That makes Northern Africa's figure about 1.2 times Yugoslav SFR's.
Across all 31 years both countries report, Yugoslav SFR has been ahead every year.
Northern Africa ranks 23rd and Yugoslav SFR ranks 23rd of 29 groups.
Yugoslav SFR has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Northern Africa | Yugoslav SFR | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 25,764 t | 126,105 t | 100,341 t | Yugoslav SFR |
| 1970s | 54,769 t | 176,856 t | 122,086 t | Yugoslav SFR |
| 1980s | 90,121 t | 241,901 t | 151,780 t | Yugoslav SFR |
| 1990s | 96,731 t | 172,150 t | 75,419 t | Yugoslav SFR |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher mineral fertilizers — cropland potassium, Northern Africa or Yugoslav SFR?
- Northern Africa, at 192,485 t against 154,300 t in Yugoslav SFR as of 2023.
- What is the difference in mineral fertilizers — cropland potassium between Northern Africa and Yugoslav SFR?
- 38,185 t, with Northern Africa ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Northern Africa and Yugoslav SFR?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1991.
- How do Northern Africa and Yugoslav SFR rank globally for mineral fertilizers — cropland potassium?
- Northern Africa ranks 23rd and Yugoslav SFR ranks 23rd of 29 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Mineral fertilizers — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).