Peru vs Romania: Mineral fertilizers — Cropland potassium
Mineral fertilizers — Cropland potassium over time
- Peru
- Romania
How they compare
Peru currently reports 74,180 t against 63,055 t in Romania, a difference of 11,125 t.
That makes Peru's figure about 1.2 times Romania's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Romania ahead.
Peru ranks 37th and Romania ranks 38th of 185 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Peru averaged higher in 3 and Romania in 4.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Peru | Romania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 5,089 t | 11,251 t | 6,163 t | Romania |
| 1970s | 8,201 t | 59,922 t | 51,720 t | Romania |
| 1980s | 14,075 t | 182,019 t | 167,944 t | Romania |
| 1990s | 13,100 t | 25,904 t | 12,805 t | Romania |
| 2000s | 35,776 t | 14,631 t | 21,145 t | Peru |
| 2010s | 71,591 t | 38,510 t | 33,081 t | Peru |
| 2020s | 89,813 t | 64,106 t | 25,706 t | Peru |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher mineral fertilizers — cropland potassium, Peru or Romania?
- Peru, at 74,180 t against 63,055 t in Romania as of 2023.
- What is the difference in mineral fertilizers — cropland potassium between Peru and Romania?
- 11,125 t, with Peru ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Peru and Romania?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Peru and Romania rank globally for mineral fertilizers — cropland potassium?
- Peru ranks 37th and Romania ranks 38th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Mineral fertilizers — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).