Poland vs Russian Federation: Mineral fertilizers — Cropland potassium
Mineral fertilizers — Cropland potassium over time
- Poland
- Russian Federation
How they compare
Russian Federation currently reports 491,222 t against 288,530 t in Poland, a difference of 202,692 t.
That makes Russian Federation's figure about 1.7 times Poland's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Russian Federation ahead.
Poland ranks 13th and Russian Federation ranks 10th of 186 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Poland averaged higher in 2 and Russian Federation in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Poland | Russian Federation | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 258,101 t | 357,907 t | 99,806 t | Russian Federation |
| 2000s | 320,724 t | 180,078 t | 140,647 t | Poland |
| 2010s | 375,420 t | 271,052 t | 104,367 t | Poland |
| 2020s | 352,136 t | 472,914 t | 120,778 t | Russian Federation |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher mineral fertilizers — cropland potassium, Poland or Russian Federation?
- Russian Federation, at 491,222 t against 288,530 t in Poland as of 2023.
- What is the difference in mineral fertilizers — cropland potassium between Poland and Russian Federation?
- 202,692 t, with Russian Federation ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Poland and Russian Federation?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Poland and Russian Federation rank globally for mineral fertilizers — cropland potassium?
- Poland ranks 13th and Russian Federation ranks 10th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Mineral fertilizers — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).