Sierra Leone vs Tajikistan: Mineral fertilizers — Cropland potassium
Mineral fertilizers — Cropland potassium over time
- Sierra Leone
- Tajikistan
How they compare
Tajikistan currently reports 1,069 t against 724.59 t in Sierra Leone, a difference of 344.41 t.
That makes Tajikistan's figure about 1.5 times Sierra Leone's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Tajikistan ahead.
Sierra Leone ranks 142nd and Tajikistan ranks 139th of 186 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Sierra Leone averaged higher in 1 and Tajikistan in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Sierra Leone | Tajikistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 573.74 t | 3,295 t | 2,721 t | Tajikistan |
| 2000s | 80.59 t | 855.5 t | 774.91 t | Tajikistan |
| 2010s | 679.44 t | 508.96 t | 170.48 t | Sierra Leone |
| 2020s | 724.59 t | 1,824 t | 1,099 t | Tajikistan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher mineral fertilizers — cropland potassium, Sierra Leone or Tajikistan?
- Tajikistan, at 1,069 t against 724.59 t in Sierra Leone as of 2023.
- What is the difference in mineral fertilizers — cropland potassium between Sierra Leone and Tajikistan?
- 344.41 t, with Tajikistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Sierra Leone and Tajikistan?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Sierra Leone and Tajikistan rank globally for mineral fertilizers — cropland potassium?
- Sierra Leone ranks 142nd and Tajikistan ranks 139th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Mineral fertilizers — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).