South Sudan vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Mineral fertilizers — Cropland potassium
Mineral fertilizers — Cropland potassium over time
- South Sudan
- Saint Kitts and Nevis
How they compare
South Sudan currently reports 3.32 t against 3.32 t in Saint Kitts and Nevis, a difference of 0 t.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 12 shared years of data; in 2012 it was Saint Kitts and Nevis ahead.
South Sudan ranks 173rd and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 173rd of 186 countries.
South Sudan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | South Sudan | Saint Kitts and Nevis | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 15.56 t | 7.37 t | 8.2 t | South Sudan |
| 2020s | 8.09 t | 3.32 t | 4.77 t | South Sudan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher mineral fertilizers — cropland potassium, South Sudan or Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- South Sudan, at 3.32 t against 3.32 t in Saint Kitts and Nevis as of 2023.
- What is the difference in mineral fertilizers — cropland potassium between South Sudan and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- 0 t, with South Sudan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for South Sudan and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2023.
- How do South Sudan and Saint Kitts and Nevis rank globally for mineral fertilizers — cropland potassium?
- South Sudan ranks 173rd and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 173rd of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Mineral fertilizers — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).