Southern Africa vs Ukraine: Mineral fertilizers — Cropland potassium
Mineral fertilizers — Cropland potassium over time
- Southern Africa
- Ukraine
How they compare
Southern Africa currently reports 160,561 t against 149,854 t in Ukraine, a difference of 10,707 t.
That makes Southern Africa's figure about 1.1 times Ukraine's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Ukraine ahead.
Southern Africa ranks 25th and Ukraine ranks 24th of 29 groups.
Across the 4 decades both report, Southern Africa averaged higher in 1 and Ukraine in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Southern Africa | Ukraine | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 105,587 t | 163,821 t | 58,234 t | Ukraine |
| 2000s | 100,415 t | 75,020 t | 25,395 t | Southern Africa |
| 2010s | 132,978 t | 201,795 t | 68,818 t | Ukraine |
| 2020s | 185,276 t | 214,054 t | 28,778 t | Ukraine |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher mineral fertilizers — cropland potassium, Southern Africa or Ukraine?
- Southern Africa, at 160,561 t against 149,854 t in Ukraine as of 2023.
- What is the difference in mineral fertilizers — cropland potassium between Southern Africa and Ukraine?
- 10,707 t, with Southern Africa ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Southern Africa and Ukraine?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Southern Africa and Ukraine rank globally for mineral fertilizers — cropland potassium?
- Southern Africa ranks 25th and Ukraine ranks 24th of 29 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Mineral fertilizers — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).