Sudan (former) vs Uganda: Mineral fertilizers — Cropland potassium
Mineral fertilizers — Cropland potassium over time
- Sudan (former)
- Uganda
How they compare
Uganda currently reports 5,262 t against 3,750 t in Sudan (former), a difference of 1,512 t.
That makes Uganda's figure about 1.4 times Sudan (former)'s.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 17 shared years of data; in 1977 it was Uganda ahead.
Sudan (former) ranks 105th and Uganda ranks 102nd of 186 countries.
Across the 5 decades both report, Sudan (former) averaged higher in 3 and Uganda in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Sudan (former) | Uganda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 63 t | 237.05 t | 174.05 t | Uganda |
| 1980s | 333.33 t | 113.54 t | 219.79 t | Sudan (former) |
| 1990s | 600 t | 898.06 t | 298.06 t | Uganda |
| 2000s | 2,650 t | 1,404 t | 1,246 t | Sudan (former) |
| 2010s | 4,350 t | 1,785 t | 2,565 t | Sudan (former) |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher mineral fertilizers — cropland potassium, Sudan (former) or Uganda?
- Uganda, at 5,262 t against 3,750 t in Sudan (former) as of 2023.
- What is the difference in mineral fertilizers — cropland potassium between Sudan (former) and Uganda?
- 1,512 t, with Uganda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Sudan (former) and Uganda?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 1977 to 2011.
- How do Sudan (former) and Uganda rank globally for mineral fertilizers — cropland potassium?
- Sudan (former) ranks 105th and Uganda ranks 102nd of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Mineral fertilizers — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).