Argentina vs Chile: Monoammonium phosphate (MAP) — Agricultural Use
Monoammonium phosphate (MAP) — Agricultural Use over time
- Argentina
- Chile
How they compare
Argentina currently reports 873,980 t against 171,209 t in Chile, a difference of 702,771 t.
That makes Argentina's figure about 5.1 times Chile's.
Across all 17 years both countries report, Argentina has been ahead every year.
Argentina ranks 4th and Chile ranks 6th of 83 countries.
Argentina has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Argentina | Chile | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 434,009 t | 85,164 t | 348,845 t | Argentina |
| 2010s | 640,077 t | 94,291 t | 545,786 t | Argentina |
| 2020s | 983,628 t | 121,700 t | 861,928 t | Argentina |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher monoammonium phosphate (map) — agricultural use, Argentina or Chile?
- Argentina, at 873,980 t against 171,209 t in Chile as of 2023.
- What is the difference in monoammonium phosphate (map) — agricultural use between Argentina and Chile?
- 702,771 t, with Argentina ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Argentina and Chile?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2023.
- How do Argentina and Chile rank globally for monoammonium phosphate (map) — agricultural use?
- Argentina ranks 4th and Chile ranks 6th of 83 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Monoammonium phosphate (MAP) — Agricultural Use. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf