Armenia vs French Polynesia: Monoammonium phosphate (MAP) — Agricultural Use
Monoammonium phosphate (MAP) — Agricultural Use over time
- Armenia
- French Polynesia
How they compare
Armenia currently reports 0 t against 0 t in French Polynesia, a difference of 0 t.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 8 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Armenia ahead.
Armenia ranks 66th and French Polynesia ranks 66th of 83 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Armenia averaged higher in 1 and French Polynesia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Armenia | French Polynesia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 273.5 t | 5 t | 268.5 t | Armenia |
| 2010s | 1 t | 3.33 t | 2.33 t | French Polynesia |
| 2020s | 0 t | 0 t | 0 t | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher monoammonium phosphate (map) — agricultural use, Armenia or French Polynesia?
- Armenia, at 0 t against 0 t in French Polynesia as of 2022.
- What is the difference in monoammonium phosphate (map) — agricultural use between Armenia and French Polynesia?
- 0 t, with Armenia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Armenia and French Polynesia?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2022.
- How do Armenia and French Polynesia rank globally for monoammonium phosphate (map) — agricultural use?
- Armenia ranks 66th and French Polynesia ranks 66th of 83 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Monoammonium phosphate (MAP) — Agricultural Use. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf