Armenia vs Luxembourg: Monoammonium phosphate (MAP) — Agricultural Use

Armenia
0 t
in 2022
Luxembourg
0 t
in 2024
Armenia rank
66th
Luxembourg rank
66th

Monoammonium phosphate (MAP) — Agricultural Use over time

  • Armenia
  • Luxembourg
05001.0k1.5k2.0k2.5k200220132024

How they compare

Armenia currently reports 0 t against 0 t in Luxembourg, a difference of 0 t.

Across all 5 years both countries report, Luxembourg has been ahead every year.

Armenia ranks 66th and Luxembourg ranks 66th of 83 countries.

Head to head by decade

Decade Armenia Luxembourg Difference Ahead
2010s 0 t 0 t 0 t
2020s 0 t 0 t 0 t

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher monoammonium phosphate (map) — agricultural use, Armenia or Luxembourg?
Armenia, at 0 t against 0 t in Luxembourg as of 2022.
What is the difference in monoammonium phosphate (map) — agricultural use between Armenia and Luxembourg?
0 t, with Armenia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Armenia and Luxembourg?
5 years are reported by both, from 2018 to 2022.
How do Armenia and Luxembourg rank globally for monoammonium phosphate (map) — agricultural use?
Armenia ranks 66th and Luxembourg ranks 66th of 83 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Monoammonium phosphate (MAP) — Agricultural Use. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Monoammonium phosphate (MAP) — Agricultural Use
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
84 places, 897 data points, 2002–2024
Last refreshed

The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf