Australia vs Canada: Monoammonium phosphate (MAP) — Agricultural Use

Australia
962,951 t
in 2017
Canada
1.48 million t
in 2024
Australia rank
2nd
Canada rank
1st

Monoammonium phosphate (MAP) — Agricultural Use over time

  • Australia
  • Canada
500.0k750.0k1.0M1.2M1.5M1.8M200920162024

How they compare

Canada currently reports 1.48 million t against 962,951 t in Australia, a difference of 517,049 t.

That makes Canada's figure about 1.5 times Australia's.

Across all 5 years both countries report, Canada has been ahead every year.

Australia ranks 2nd and Canada ranks 1st of 83 countries.

Canada has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher monoammonium phosphate (map) — agricultural use, Australia or Canada?
Canada, at 1.48 million t against 962,951 t in Australia as of 2024.
What is the difference in monoammonium phosphate (map) — agricultural use between Australia and Canada?
517,049 t, with Canada ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Canada?
5 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2017.
How do Australia and Canada rank globally for monoammonium phosphate (map) — agricultural use?
Australia ranks 2nd and Canada ranks 1st of 83 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Monoammonium phosphate (MAP) — Agricultural Use. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Monoammonium phosphate (MAP) — Agricultural Use
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
84 places, 897 data points, 2002–2024
Last refreshed

The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf