Azerbaijan vs North Macedonia: Monoammonium phosphate (MAP) — Agricultural Use
Monoammonium phosphate (MAP) — Agricultural Use over time
- Azerbaijan
- North Macedonia
How they compare
North Macedonia currently reports 151 t against 136 t in Azerbaijan, a difference of 15 t.
That makes North Macedonia's figure about 1.1 times Azerbaijan's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 7 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Azerbaijan ahead.
Azerbaijan ranks 52nd and North Macedonia ranks 51st of 77 countries.
Azerbaijan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Azerbaijan | North Macedonia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 1,077 t | 430 t | 647.2 t | Azerbaijan |
| 2010s | 88 t | 80 t | 8 t | Azerbaijan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher monoammonium phosphate (map) — agricultural use, Azerbaijan or North Macedonia?
- North Macedonia, at 151 t against 136 t in Azerbaijan as of 2011.
- What is the difference in monoammonium phosphate (map) — agricultural use between Azerbaijan and North Macedonia?
- 15 t, with North Macedonia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Azerbaijan and North Macedonia?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2011.
- How do Azerbaijan and North Macedonia rank globally for monoammonium phosphate (map) — agricultural use?
- Azerbaijan ranks 52nd and North Macedonia ranks 51st of 77 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Monoammonium phosphate (MAP) — Agricultural Use. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf