Chile vs Republic of Moldova: Monoammonium phosphate (MAP) — Agricultural Use
Monoammonium phosphate (MAP) — Agricultural Use over time
- Chile
- Republic of Moldova
How they compare
Chile currently reports 171,209 t against 14,434 t in Republic of Moldova, a difference of 156,775 t.
That makes Chile's figure about 11.9 times Republic of Moldova's.
Across all 7 years both countries report, Chile has been ahead every year.
Chile ranks 6th and Republic of Moldova ranks 3rd of 77 countries.
Chile has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | Republic of Moldova | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 51,093 t | 3,197 t | 47,896 t | Chile |
| 2010s | 95,131 t | 10,210 t | 84,920 t | Chile |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher monoammonium phosphate (map) — agricultural use, Chile or Republic of Moldova?
- Chile, at 171,209 t against 14,434 t in Republic of Moldova as of 2024.
- What is the difference in monoammonium phosphate (map) — agricultural use between Chile and Republic of Moldova?
- 156,775 t, with Chile ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Republic of Moldova?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2016.
- How do Chile and Republic of Moldova rank globally for monoammonium phosphate (map) — agricultural use?
- Chile ranks 6th and Republic of Moldova ranks 3rd of 77 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Monoammonium phosphate (MAP) — Agricultural Use. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf