Cuba vs Namibia: Monoammonium phosphate (MAP) — Agricultural Use
Monoammonium phosphate (MAP) — Agricultural Use over time
- Cuba
- Namibia
How they compare
Namibia currently reports 30 t against 21 t in Cuba, a difference of 9 t.
That makes Namibia's figure about 1.4 times Cuba's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 7 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Cuba ahead.
Cuba ranks 61st and Namibia ranks 59th of 83 countries.
Cuba has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cuba | Namibia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 369 t | 20.4 t | 348.6 t | Cuba |
| 2010s | 145 t | 29.5 t | 115.5 t | Cuba |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher monoammonium phosphate (map) — agricultural use, Cuba or Namibia?
- Namibia, at 30 t against 21 t in Cuba as of 2011.
- What is the difference in monoammonium phosphate (map) — agricultural use between Cuba and Namibia?
- 9 t, with Namibia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Namibia?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2011.
- How do Cuba and Namibia rank globally for monoammonium phosphate (map) — agricultural use?
- Cuba ranks 61st and Namibia ranks 59th of 83 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Monoammonium phosphate (MAP) — Agricultural Use. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf