Ecuador vs Hungary: Monoammonium phosphate (MAP) — Agricultural Use
Ecuador
16,659 t
in 2023
Hungary
17,119 t
in 2024
Ecuador rank
21st
Hungary rank
20th
Monoammonium phosphate (MAP) — Agricultural Use over time
- Ecuador
- Hungary
How they compare
Hungary currently reports 17,119 t against 16,659 t in Ecuador, a difference of 460 t.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 13 shared years of data; in 2008 it was Hungary ahead.
Ecuador ranks 21st and Hungary ranks 20th of 83 countries.
Hungary has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | Hungary | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 12,430 t | 20,496 t | 8,066 t | Hungary |
| 2010s | 12,130 t | 33,941 t | 21,811 t | Hungary |
| 2020s | 9,687 t | 17,216 t | 7,529 t | Hungary |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher monoammonium phosphate (map) — agricultural use, Ecuador or Hungary?
- Hungary, at 17,119 t against 16,659 t in Ecuador as of 2024.
- What is the difference in monoammonium phosphate (map) — agricultural use between Ecuador and Hungary?
- 460 t, with Hungary ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Hungary?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2023.
- How do Ecuador and Hungary rank globally for monoammonium phosphate (map) — agricultural use?
- Ecuador ranks 21st and Hungary ranks 20th of 83 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Monoammonium phosphate (MAP) — Agricultural Use. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf