Ecuador vs Peru: Monoammonium phosphate (MAP) — Agricultural Use
Monoammonium phosphate (MAP) — Agricultural Use over time
- Ecuador
- Peru
How they compare
Ecuador currently reports 16,659 t against 15,631 t in Peru, a difference of 1,028 t.
That makes Ecuador's figure about 1.1 times Peru's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 9 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Peru ahead.
Ecuador ranks 21st and Peru ranks 22nd of 83 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Ecuador averaged higher in 1 and Peru in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | Peru | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 3,963 t | 4,182 t | 219.43 t | Peru |
| 2010s | 23,258 t | 10,922 t | 12,336 t | Ecuador |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher monoammonium phosphate (map) — agricultural use, Ecuador or Peru?
- Ecuador, at 16,659 t against 15,631 t in Peru as of 2023.
- What is the difference in monoammonium phosphate (map) — agricultural use between Ecuador and Peru?
- 1,028 t, with Ecuador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Peru?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2011.
- How do Ecuador and Peru rank globally for monoammonium phosphate (map) — agricultural use?
- Ecuador ranks 21st and Peru ranks 22nd of 83 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Monoammonium phosphate (MAP) — Agricultural Use. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf