Guatemala vs Lithuania: Monoammonium phosphate (MAP) — Agricultural Use
Monoammonium phosphate (MAP) — Agricultural Use over time
- Guatemala
- Lithuania
How they compare
Guatemala currently reports 10,287 t against 6,684 t in Lithuania, a difference of 3,603 t.
That makes Guatemala's figure about 1.5 times Lithuania's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Lithuania ahead.
Guatemala ranks 29th and Lithuania ranks 32nd of 83 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Guatemala averaged higher in 1 and Lithuania in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guatemala | Lithuania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 9,693 t | 36,514 t | 26,821 t | Lithuania |
| 2010s | 20,652 t | 3,782 t | 16,870 t | Guatemala |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher monoammonium phosphate (map) — agricultural use, Guatemala or Lithuania?
- Guatemala, at 10,287 t against 6,684 t in Lithuania as of 2011.
- What is the difference in monoammonium phosphate (map) — agricultural use between Guatemala and Lithuania?
- 3,603 t, with Guatemala ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guatemala and Lithuania?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2011.
- How do Guatemala and Lithuania rank globally for monoammonium phosphate (map) — agricultural use?
- Guatemala ranks 29th and Lithuania ranks 32nd of 83 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Monoammonium phosphate (MAP) — Agricultural Use. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf