Latvia vs Uganda: Monoammonium phosphate (MAP) — Agricultural Use

Latvia
168 t
in 2009
Uganda
254 t
in 2011
Latvia rank
54th
Uganda rank
51st

Monoammonium phosphate (MAP) — Agricultural Use over time

  • Latvia
  • Uganda
02.5k5.0k7.5k10.0k200220062011

How they compare

Uganda currently reports 254 t against 168 t in Latvia, a difference of 86 t.

That makes Uganda's figure about 1.5 times Latvia's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Latvia ahead.

Latvia ranks 54th and Uganda ranks 51st of 83 countries.

Latvia has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher monoammonium phosphate (map) — agricultural use, Latvia or Uganda?
Uganda, at 254 t against 168 t in Latvia as of 2011.
What is the difference in monoammonium phosphate (map) — agricultural use between Latvia and Uganda?
86 t, with Uganda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Uganda?
5 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2009.
How do Latvia and Uganda rank globally for monoammonium phosphate (map) — agricultural use?
Latvia ranks 54th and Uganda ranks 51st of 83 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Monoammonium phosphate (MAP) — Agricultural Use. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Monoammonium phosphate (MAP) — Agricultural Use
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
84 places, 897 data points, 2002–2024
Last refreshed

The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf