Luxembourg vs Samoa: Monoammonium phosphate (MAP) — Agricultural Use

Luxembourg
0 t
in 2024
Samoa
0 t
in 2020
Luxembourg rank
66th
Samoa rank
66th

Monoammonium phosphate (MAP) — Agricultural Use over time

  • Luxembourg
  • Samoa
00.511.52200220132024

How they compare

Luxembourg currently reports 0 t against 0 t in Samoa, a difference of 0 t.

Across all 5 years both countries report, Samoa has been ahead every year.

Luxembourg ranks 66th and Samoa ranks 66th of 83 countries.

Head to head by decade

Decade Luxembourg Samoa Difference Ahead
2010s 0 t 0 t 0 t
2020s 0 t 0 t 0 t

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher monoammonium phosphate (map) — agricultural use, Luxembourg or Samoa?
Luxembourg, at 0 t against 0 t in Samoa as of 2024.
What is the difference in monoammonium phosphate (map) — agricultural use between Luxembourg and Samoa?
0 t, with Luxembourg ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Luxembourg and Samoa?
5 years are reported by both, from 2016 to 2020.
How do Luxembourg and Samoa rank globally for monoammonium phosphate (map) — agricultural use?
Luxembourg ranks 66th and Samoa ranks 66th of 83 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Monoammonium phosphate (MAP) — Agricultural Use. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Monoammonium phosphate (MAP) — Agricultural Use
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
84 places, 897 data points, 2002–2024
Last refreshed

The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf