Luxembourg vs Switzerland: Monoammonium phosphate (MAP) — Agricultural Use
Luxembourg
0 t
in 2024
Switzerland
0 t
in 2021
Luxembourg rank
66th
Switzerland rank
66th
Monoammonium phosphate (MAP) — Agricultural Use over time
- Luxembourg
- Switzerland
How they compare
Luxembourg currently reports 0 t against 0 t in Switzerland, a difference of 0 t.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Switzerland has been ahead every year.
Luxembourg ranks 66th and Switzerland ranks 66th of 83 countries.
Switzerland has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Luxembourg | Switzerland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 2 t | 474.5 t | 472.5 t | Switzerland |
| 2010s | 0 t | 4 t | 4 t | Switzerland |
| 2020s | 0 t | 0 t | 0 t | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher monoammonium phosphate (map) — agricultural use, Luxembourg or Switzerland?
- Luxembourg, at 0 t against 0 t in Switzerland as of 2024.
- What is the difference in monoammonium phosphate (map) — agricultural use between Luxembourg and Switzerland?
- 0 t, with Luxembourg ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Luxembourg and Switzerland?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2021.
- How do Luxembourg and Switzerland rank globally for monoammonium phosphate (map) — agricultural use?
- Luxembourg ranks 66th and Switzerland ranks 66th of 83 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Monoammonium phosphate (MAP) — Agricultural Use. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf