New Caledonia vs Switzerland: Monoammonium phosphate (MAP) — Agricultural Use
New Caledonia
0 t
in 2016
Switzerland
0 t
in 2021
New Caledonia rank
61st
Switzerland rank
61st
Monoammonium phosphate (MAP) — Agricultural Use over time
- New Caledonia
- Switzerland
How they compare
New Caledonia currently reports 0 t against 0 t in Switzerland, a difference of 0 t.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Switzerland has been ahead every year.
New Caledonia ranks 61st and Switzerland ranks 61st of 77 countries.
Switzerland has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | New Caledonia | Switzerland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 13 t | 138 t | 125 t | Switzerland |
| 2010s | 0 t | 706.5 t | 706.5 t | Switzerland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher monoammonium phosphate (map) — agricultural use, New Caledonia or Switzerland?
- New Caledonia, at 0 t against 0 t in Switzerland as of 2016.
- What is the difference in monoammonium phosphate (map) — agricultural use between New Caledonia and Switzerland?
- 0 t, with New Caledonia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for New Caledonia and Switzerland?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2016.
- How do New Caledonia and Switzerland rank globally for monoammonium phosphate (map) — agricultural use?
- New Caledonia ranks 61st and Switzerland ranks 61st of 77 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Monoammonium phosphate (MAP) — Agricultural Use. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf