Oman vs Tunisia: Monoammonium phosphate (MAP) — Agricultural Use

Oman
0 t
in 2022
Tunisia
0 t
in 2016
Oman rank
66th
Tunisia rank
66th

Monoammonium phosphate (MAP) — Agricultural Use over time

  • Oman
  • Tunisia
05001.0k1.5k2.0k200220122022

How they compare

Oman currently reports 0 t against 0 t in Tunisia, a difference of 0 t.

Across all 5 years both countries report, Tunisia has been ahead every year.

Oman ranks 66th and Tunisia ranks 66th of 83 countries.

Tunisia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Oman Tunisia Difference Ahead
2000s 138 t 980 t 842 t Tunisia
2010s 137 t 436 t 299 t Tunisia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher monoammonium phosphate (map) — agricultural use, Oman or Tunisia?
Oman, at 0 t against 0 t in Tunisia as of 2022.
What is the difference in monoammonium phosphate (map) — agricultural use between Oman and Tunisia?
0 t, with Oman ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Oman and Tunisia?
5 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2011.
How do Oman and Tunisia rank globally for monoammonium phosphate (map) — agricultural use?
Oman ranks 66th and Tunisia ranks 66th of 83 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Monoammonium phosphate (MAP) — Agricultural Use. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Monoammonium phosphate (MAP) — Agricultural Use
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
84 places, 897 data points, 2002–2024
Last refreshed

The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf