Belgium vs Lithuania: Monoammonium phosphate (MAP) — Export quantity
Monoammonium phosphate (MAP) — Export quantity over time
- Belgium
- Lithuania
How they compare
Lithuania currently reports 118,567 t against 59,932 t in Belgium, a difference of 58,635 t.
That makes Lithuania's figure about 2.0 times Belgium's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 18 shared years of data; in 2007 it was Belgium ahead.
Belgium ranks 10th and Lithuania ranks 7th of 86 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Belgium averaged higher in 2 and Lithuania in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belgium | Lithuania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 62,211 t | 2,852 t | 59,360 t | Belgium |
| 2010s | 61,567 t | 14,798 t | 46,768 t | Belgium |
| 2020s | 55,997 t | 66,055 t | 10,058 t | Lithuania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher monoammonium phosphate (map) — export quantity, Belgium or Lithuania?
- Lithuania, at 118,567 t against 59,932 t in Belgium as of 2024.
- What is the difference in monoammonium phosphate (map) — export quantity between Belgium and Lithuania?
- 58,635 t, with Lithuania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium and Lithuania?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2024.
- How do Belgium and Lithuania rank globally for monoammonium phosphate (map) — export quantity?
- Belgium ranks 10th and Lithuania ranks 7th of 86 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Monoammonium phosphate (MAP) — Export quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf