Croatia vs Switzerland: Monoammonium phosphate (MAP) — Export quantity
Monoammonium phosphate (MAP) — Export quantity over time
- Croatia
- Switzerland
How they compare
Switzerland currently reports 20.05 t against 16.32 t in Croatia, a difference of 3.73 t.
That makes Switzerland's figure about 1.2 times Croatia's.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 16 shared years of data; in 2007 it was Croatia ahead.
Croatia ranks 78th and Switzerland ranks 75th of 86 countries.
Croatia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Croatia | Switzerland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 40.63 t | 0.875 t | 39.75 t | Croatia |
| 2010s | 239.15 t | 3.34 t | 235.82 t | Croatia |
| 2020s | 125.98 t | 4.35 t | 121.63 t | Croatia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher monoammonium phosphate (map) — export quantity, Croatia or Switzerland?
- Switzerland, at 20.05 t against 16.32 t in Croatia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in monoammonium phosphate (map) — export quantity between Croatia and Switzerland?
- 3.73 t, with Switzerland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Croatia and Switzerland?
- 16 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2024.
- How do Croatia and Switzerland rank globally for monoammonium phosphate (map) — export quantity?
- Croatia ranks 78th and Switzerland ranks 75th of 86 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Monoammonium phosphate (MAP) — Export quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf