Denmark vs Ecuador: Monoammonium phosphate (MAP) — Export quantity
Monoammonium phosphate (MAP) — Export quantity over time
- Denmark
- Ecuador
How they compare
Ecuador currently reports 101.4 t against 69.23 t in Denmark, a difference of 32.17 t.
That makes Ecuador's figure about 1.5 times Denmark's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 12 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Denmark ahead.
Denmark ranks 65th and Ecuador ranks 63rd of 82 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Denmark averaged higher in 2 and Ecuador in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Denmark | Ecuador | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 335.17 t | 5.61 t | 329.56 t | Denmark |
| 2010s | 815.59 t | 227.09 t | 588.5 t | Denmark |
| 2020s | 46.43 t | 120.7 t | 74.27 t | Ecuador |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher monoammonium phosphate (map) — export quantity, Denmark or Ecuador?
- Ecuador, at 101.4 t against 69.23 t in Denmark as of 2024.
- What is the difference in monoammonium phosphate (map) — export quantity between Denmark and Ecuador?
- 32.17 t, with Ecuador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Denmark and Ecuador?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2024.
- How do Denmark and Ecuador rank globally for monoammonium phosphate (map) — export quantity?
- Denmark ranks 65th and Ecuador ranks 63rd of 82 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Monoammonium phosphate (MAP) — Export quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf