Guatemala vs India: Monoammonium phosphate (MAP) — Export quantity
Monoammonium phosphate (MAP) — Export quantity over time
- Guatemala
- India
How they compare
Guatemala currently reports 184.13 t against 161.08 t in India, a difference of 23.05 t.
That makes Guatemala's figure about 1.1 times India's.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 21 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Guatemala ahead.
Guatemala ranks 61st and India ranks 63rd of 86 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Guatemala averaged higher in 1 and India in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guatemala | India | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 77.64 t | 15,572 t | 15,495 t | India |
| 2010s | 959.48 t | 312.13 t | 647.35 t | Guatemala |
| 2020s | 604.19 t | 1,269 t | 665.17 t | India |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher monoammonium phosphate (map) — export quantity, Guatemala or India?
- Guatemala, at 184.13 t against 161.08 t in India as of 2024.
- What is the difference in monoammonium phosphate (map) — export quantity between Guatemala and India?
- 23.05 t, with Guatemala ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guatemala and India?
- 21 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Guatemala and India rank globally for monoammonium phosphate (map) — export quantity?
- Guatemala ranks 61st and India ranks 63rd of 86 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Monoammonium phosphate (MAP) — Export quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf